Regular expression exclude some words but match to one











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Is it possible to write a regex which is matching to "findme" but doesn't match if the line contains "black" or "red" or "yellow" words?



Possible regex: (?!black|red|yellow)findme


excluded words: yellow , black , red



Test lines:



findme     (OK)
xyz (NOT!)
XYZfindmeXYZ (OK)
somethingelseFINDMEsome_thingelse (OK)
BLACK_ findme (NOT !)
BLACK findme (NOT !)
XyBlacK findme xyz_xy (NOT !)
xy findme RED (NOT !)
yellow__ findme _xy (NOT !)
_xy_ findme _something (OK)









share|improve this question






















  • In what context? What language are you working with? What are you trying to achieve?
    – Andy Lester
    Nov 9 at 18:21















up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Is it possible to write a regex which is matching to "findme" but doesn't match if the line contains "black" or "red" or "yellow" words?



Possible regex: (?!black|red|yellow)findme


excluded words: yellow , black , red



Test lines:



findme     (OK)
xyz (NOT!)
XYZfindmeXYZ (OK)
somethingelseFINDMEsome_thingelse (OK)
BLACK_ findme (NOT !)
BLACK findme (NOT !)
XyBlacK findme xyz_xy (NOT !)
xy findme RED (NOT !)
yellow__ findme _xy (NOT !)
_xy_ findme _something (OK)









share|improve this question






















  • In what context? What language are you working with? What are you trying to achieve?
    – Andy Lester
    Nov 9 at 18:21













up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





Is it possible to write a regex which is matching to "findme" but doesn't match if the line contains "black" or "red" or "yellow" words?



Possible regex: (?!black|red|yellow)findme


excluded words: yellow , black , red



Test lines:



findme     (OK)
xyz (NOT!)
XYZfindmeXYZ (OK)
somethingelseFINDMEsome_thingelse (OK)
BLACK_ findme (NOT !)
BLACK findme (NOT !)
XyBlacK findme xyz_xy (NOT !)
xy findme RED (NOT !)
yellow__ findme _xy (NOT !)
_xy_ findme _something (OK)









share|improve this question













Is it possible to write a regex which is matching to "findme" but doesn't match if the line contains "black" or "red" or "yellow" words?



Possible regex: (?!black|red|yellow)findme


excluded words: yellow , black , red



Test lines:



findme     (OK)
xyz (NOT!)
XYZfindmeXYZ (OK)
somethingelseFINDMEsome_thingelse (OK)
BLACK_ findme (NOT !)
BLACK findme (NOT !)
XyBlacK findme xyz_xy (NOT !)
xy findme RED (NOT !)
yellow__ findme _xy (NOT !)
_xy_ findme _something (OK)






regex regex-negation regex-lookarounds






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 9 at 16:16









user2287094

358




358












  • In what context? What language are you working with? What are you trying to achieve?
    – Andy Lester
    Nov 9 at 18:21


















  • In what context? What language are you working with? What are you trying to achieve?
    – Andy Lester
    Nov 9 at 18:21
















In what context? What language are you working with? What are you trying to achieve?
– Andy Lester
Nov 9 at 18:21




In what context? What language are you working with? What are you trying to achieve?
– Andy Lester
Nov 9 at 18:21












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













You can use the following regex:



^(?!.*(?:black|red|yellow)).*(findme)



Demo: https://regexr.com/42r4q





Details:





  • ^ - matches start of the string


  • (?!) - negative lookahead


  • .* - Match any character (except newlines) 0+ times


  • (?:) - non-capturing group


  • black|red|yellow - matches 'black', 'red' or 'yellow'


  • findme - matches 'findme' string


Flags:





  • g - global


  • i - case-insensitive


  • m - multiline






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    You don’t need the trailing look ahead. The first look ahead covers the entire input.
    – Bohemian
    Nov 9 at 18:07










  • Aha! thanks. I just noticed the fact.
    – rv7
    Nov 9 at 18:12


















up vote
0
down vote













Use a negative look ahead, anchored to start, for the unwanted terms:



^(?i)(?!.*(black|red|yellow)).*findme


See live demo passing all your tests.



(?i) means “ignore case"
(?!...) is a negative look ahead (asserts without consuming that the expression is not found)






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53229463%2fregular-expression-exclude-some-words-but-match-to-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    You can use the following regex:



    ^(?!.*(?:black|red|yellow)).*(findme)



    Demo: https://regexr.com/42r4q





    Details:





    • ^ - matches start of the string


    • (?!) - negative lookahead


    • .* - Match any character (except newlines) 0+ times


    • (?:) - non-capturing group


    • black|red|yellow - matches 'black', 'red' or 'yellow'


    • findme - matches 'findme' string


    Flags:





    • g - global


    • i - case-insensitive


    • m - multiline






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      You don’t need the trailing look ahead. The first look ahead covers the entire input.
      – Bohemian
      Nov 9 at 18:07










    • Aha! thanks. I just noticed the fact.
      – rv7
      Nov 9 at 18:12















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    You can use the following regex:



    ^(?!.*(?:black|red|yellow)).*(findme)



    Demo: https://regexr.com/42r4q





    Details:





    • ^ - matches start of the string


    • (?!) - negative lookahead


    • .* - Match any character (except newlines) 0+ times


    • (?:) - non-capturing group


    • black|red|yellow - matches 'black', 'red' or 'yellow'


    • findme - matches 'findme' string


    Flags:





    • g - global


    • i - case-insensitive


    • m - multiline






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      You don’t need the trailing look ahead. The first look ahead covers the entire input.
      – Bohemian
      Nov 9 at 18:07










    • Aha! thanks. I just noticed the fact.
      – rv7
      Nov 9 at 18:12













    up vote
    1
    down vote










    up vote
    1
    down vote









    You can use the following regex:



    ^(?!.*(?:black|red|yellow)).*(findme)



    Demo: https://regexr.com/42r4q





    Details:





    • ^ - matches start of the string


    • (?!) - negative lookahead


    • .* - Match any character (except newlines) 0+ times


    • (?:) - non-capturing group


    • black|red|yellow - matches 'black', 'red' or 'yellow'


    • findme - matches 'findme' string


    Flags:





    • g - global


    • i - case-insensitive


    • m - multiline






    share|improve this answer














    You can use the following regex:



    ^(?!.*(?:black|red|yellow)).*(findme)



    Demo: https://regexr.com/42r4q





    Details:





    • ^ - matches start of the string


    • (?!) - negative lookahead


    • .* - Match any character (except newlines) 0+ times


    • (?:) - non-capturing group


    • black|red|yellow - matches 'black', 'red' or 'yellow'


    • findme - matches 'findme' string


    Flags:





    • g - global


    • i - case-insensitive


    • m - multiline







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 9 at 18:26

























    answered Nov 9 at 16:23









    rv7

    1,6361322




    1,6361322








    • 1




      You don’t need the trailing look ahead. The first look ahead covers the entire input.
      – Bohemian
      Nov 9 at 18:07










    • Aha! thanks. I just noticed the fact.
      – rv7
      Nov 9 at 18:12














    • 1




      You don’t need the trailing look ahead. The first look ahead covers the entire input.
      – Bohemian
      Nov 9 at 18:07










    • Aha! thanks. I just noticed the fact.
      – rv7
      Nov 9 at 18:12








    1




    1




    You don’t need the trailing look ahead. The first look ahead covers the entire input.
    – Bohemian
    Nov 9 at 18:07




    You don’t need the trailing look ahead. The first look ahead covers the entire input.
    – Bohemian
    Nov 9 at 18:07












    Aha! thanks. I just noticed the fact.
    – rv7
    Nov 9 at 18:12




    Aha! thanks. I just noticed the fact.
    – rv7
    Nov 9 at 18:12












    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Use a negative look ahead, anchored to start, for the unwanted terms:



    ^(?i)(?!.*(black|red|yellow)).*findme


    See live demo passing all your tests.



    (?i) means “ignore case"
    (?!...) is a negative look ahead (asserts without consuming that the expression is not found)






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Use a negative look ahead, anchored to start, for the unwanted terms:



      ^(?i)(?!.*(black|red|yellow)).*findme


      See live demo passing all your tests.



      (?i) means “ignore case"
      (?!...) is a negative look ahead (asserts without consuming that the expression is not found)






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Use a negative look ahead, anchored to start, for the unwanted terms:



        ^(?i)(?!.*(black|red|yellow)).*findme


        See live demo passing all your tests.



        (?i) means “ignore case"
        (?!...) is a negative look ahead (asserts without consuming that the expression is not found)






        share|improve this answer














        Use a negative look ahead, anchored to start, for the unwanted terms:



        ^(?i)(?!.*(black|red|yellow)).*findme


        See live demo passing all your tests.



        (?i) means “ignore case"
        (?!...) is a negative look ahead (asserts without consuming that the expression is not found)







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 9 at 18:16

























        answered Nov 9 at 18:10









        Bohemian

        291k61410547




        291k61410547






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53229463%2fregular-expression-exclude-some-words-but-match-to-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Schultheiß

            Verwaltungsgliederung Dänemarks

            Liste der Kulturdenkmale in Wilsdruff